The Triplets of Belleville: Movie & DVD Review (2003)
(Originally published 2003)
Sylvain Chomet’s Academy Award-nominated “The Triplets of Belleville,” is by far one of 2003’s more original and eccentric films. It was one of last year’s brightest highpoints, and while it will probably lose Best Animated Picture to “Finding Nemo,” which won the sort of critical and financial acclaim the Academy loves, it is in many ways a better, more accomplished movie.
The film employs elements of the past, spins them on an axis corked with quirks, and forges a new direction for contemporary animation. It’s terrific.
Beginning in 1950s Paris, “Triplets” opens with the stout, club-footed Madame Souza trying her best to raise her glum grandson, Champion, a restless French boy whose utter boredom is given only a modest reprieve when Souza buys him a bumbling dog named Bruno. Time and again Souza tries to get the boy interested in something— anything, really, her devotion to him is so great--but nothing seems to capture his limited imagination.
And then things change.
While making Champion’s bed, Souza happens upon the boy’s scrapbook, in which are dozens of photos of bicycles, handsome men and beautiful women posing beside bicycles, and photos of the Tour de France itself. With haste, she purchases the boy a tricycle and then watches--with blinking satisfaction--as his face at last glows with life.
Years pass, all age, especially the dog, whose penchant for barking at the Metro as it roars past their house is one of the film’s best recurring gags. Also noticeably older is Champion, who is now a sleek adult with absurdly oversized calves and thighs, the likes of which could crack a nut. He’s in training for the Tour, with his stalwart grandmother and her formidable whistle standing as the driving forces that encourage him to succeed.
The movie finds its meat not only on the streets of Paris, where Champion and Souza must train in the crush of traffic, but within the Tour itself, when Champion is kidnapped by a mysterious group of thugs who want to use him in a gambling ring. <>Without giving too much away, it’s up to Souza and Bruno to track Champion down, with each journeying to the strange, terrifying metropolis of Belleville in an effort to save him.
There, they come upon the triplets of the title, a good-humored, former Vaudeville act now crooked with age and, one expects, more than a bit crazy. Their diet, for instance, is a horror show of blown-up frogs and tadpoles that make for the most ghastly of soups and salads. Still, they’re a happy and well-connected bunch--and they become crucial to the plot.
On the heels of Richard Linklater’s “Waking Life” and last year’s Japanese import, “Spirited Away,” this enjoyably bizarre, mostly hand-drawn movie is the third animated installment in as many years to pointedly shatter the Disney formula.
It’s so far out there, so much its own beast, it’s difficult to capture in a review, particularly since a great deal of its success doesn’t come from mere plot points, but from the joy of watching Chomet’s great imagination at work.
I’ve seen this movie twice and will see it again. What I like about it is that it offers something daring and fresh amidst an artform that has become increasingly predictable and generic in spite of--or because of--the computer-generated windowdressing of contemporary animation.
Fans of Betty Boop, Chuck Jones, Edward Gorey and Jacques Tati all will delight in “Triplets,” as Chomet tips his hat to all of them, as will those seeking a movie that sideswipes convention on its way to surpassing expectations.
Save for a single opening and closing line of dialogue, “The Triplets of Belleville” is essentially wordless, so you can imagine the challenges that Chomet faced to tell his story well and to involve audiences without the hook of dialogue. That he does so is one of the movie’s triumphs, but really, in the end, it’s just the start of them.
Grade: A
October 10, 2008 at 7:32 PM
I have not seen this movie so I cannot make comment on it - but I saw a preview and did not think too highly of it - felt it was not my type of movie
October 10, 2008 at 9:56 PM
yesss! first guess. great movie
October 11, 2008 at 9:05 PM
I have not seen this movie, but I will try to rent it and check it out
October 14, 2008 at 4:22 AM
Hmmm...not my particular cup of tea...but if you recommend it I may have to check it out.
August 23, 2010 at 10:21 PM
This website is the best quality I enjoyed it a lot
January 14, 2011 at 9:39 PM
I loved your blog. Thank you.