24-HOUR VALENTINE'S GIVEAWAY: RED IPOD NANO!

2/13/2010 Posted by Admin


And you thought we wouldn't send a little love your way for Valentine's Day.  Get real!

You've got ONLY 24 hours to win this beautiful red iPod Nano (which has video!), so bring the love!  Just as we've done with our $1,700 iMac 27-inch giveaway, our Apple iPad giveaway, our Nintendo Wii giveaway and our iPod Touch 64GB giveaway, we're offering a super easy way to win the iPod Nano.

There are three ways to win!  Choose one or all!

  • SHARE the link on your Facebook account (you can do so by clicking the "Share" button at the top right of this page) and let us know in the comments section of this post that you did so.  We'll check that you did--and you'll be entered.  Each time you "share," it equals one entry--you share as often as you like.

  • Tweet the entry.  Just Tweet this message to your followers for an entry:  "I entered the 24-Hour Valentine's Day Apple Nano Giveaway at @weekinrewind here: http://bit.ly/btSgPg One Tweet = 1 Entry! ReTweet often!"  Just let us know you did so in the comments section.  We'll check that you did--and you'll be entered.  Each time you Tweet the message, it equals one entry--you can do so as often as you like.
  • Comment on this post and note that you're a subscriber!  If you are (we'll check), you're in to win!

That's it!

You must be a member of the site to win.  DO SO BY CHOOSING EITHER ONE:

Subscribe to our feed here.

Receive email updates here.

Make sure you comment on this post that you are a member; we'll check and, if you are, you're good to go.  The contest will end February 14, 2010, at 9 p.m., and the winner will be announced!

Don't forget that we giveaway lots of DVDs and Video Games HERE.  Try your hand at those!

Join our fan page on Facebook here.

Good luck!

XO!

Christopher

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Netvibes

1569 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1601 – 1569 of 1569   Newer›   Newest»
«Oldest ‹Older   1601 – 1569 of 1569   Newer› Newest»