Bette Davis: Centenary Collections

4/03/2008 Posted by Admin


“The Bette Davis Collection, Vol. 3”
"Bette Davis Centenary Celebration Collection"

On April 5, Bette Davis would have turned 100 years old. Had she lived to see the day, she likely would have blown a bemused puff of smoke and gone about her business pretending it wasn’t important, but awaiting a grand celebration nevertheless.

This is her centenary, and with two new DVD collections just out to celebrate her work, what better time than now to honor all that Davis has given us over the course of her career, and also to reflect upon how she got there in the first place?

Born Ruth Elizabeth Davis in Lowell, Mass., on April 5, 1908, Davis made relatively quick work of joining our best, most iconic movie actors, of which there are precious few. She defied convention. As she rose up through the ranks in early 1930s Hollywood, she hardly was what those in the industry were seeking at a time when the bold curves of Jean Harlow, Carole Lombard and Mae West were commanding the screen.

And yet while Davis may not have had their overt sexuality, what she did have was something arguably more lasting and important--a sense of mischief and mystery, an indomitable spirit that could lay the world flat with a mere glance, and a fierce intelligence that often revealed itself as impatience, particularly when she knew she’d been saddled with dreck.

Much like her Yankee counterpart Katharine Hepburn, Davis became a woman Hollywood--and the world--couldn't do without.

The camera loved her, for sure, as any fan of “Ex-Lady,” “All About Eve” and “Dark Victory” will tell you. But even when she saw in the 1960s what years of heavy drinking and smoking had done to her, she wasn’t one to overlook the opportunity her faded flower offered. Accepting herself as she was, she turned herself into a grotesque in such films as “Hush…Hush, Sweet Charlotte” and “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane,” the latter of which won her her 10th Academy Award nomination. So, you can imagine the cocktails that flowed when that nomination was announced, and those that followed when she lost to Anne Bancroft for her work in “The Miracle Worker.”

Still, it was Davis’ seemingly bottomless talent and her staunch refusal to conform that made her a star. She was a perfectionist and could be so difficult and demanding that her boss, Jack Warner, once called her “an explosive little broad with a sharp left.” That she was completely different from anyone else didn’t hurt her career, either.

What Davis had was a vitality the screen barely could contain--a director like William Wyler, for instance, could shoot her at a distance in a crowded room, as he did in “Jezebel” and “The Little Foxes,” and still she’d be the one you’d pick out and follow. Her presence was that great, a mix of genetics and her formidable will.

In her 1962 autobiography “The Lonely Life,” she wrote about herself: “I have always been driven by some distant music--a battle hymn no doubt--for I have been at war from the beginning. I rode into the field with sword gleaming and standard flying. I was going to conquer the world.”

She wasn’t joking, and she’d be the first to tell you that she did it the hard way. But what results. When she made an entrance in her more fiery films, she seemed to have the world's throat in her hand--or at least her co-star’s. Usually both. Likewise, when she left a room, it wasn’t out of place to hear a door slamming behind her. Audiences liked it that way--so did she.

And yet there was that other side of Davis--the less-intimidating side, as seen in such movies as “Now, Voyager,” “The Old Maid” or “Mr. Skeffington”--which complicated her beyond reason, and which earned her our hearts as well as our respect and admiration. The fact that she was consistently watchable even in her bad movies gets to the core of just how transfixing a figure she was.

In Maine, where she summered as a child, she eventually came to live for several years in the 1950s with her fourth husband, the actor Gary Merrill. They lived in Cape Elizabeth at a house called “Witch-Way.” Guess who named it? The house now is gone, burned down by new owners who wanted one of those garish McMansions cluttering the coast. In doing so, they neatly abolished an important part of Maine history, as well as national history.

Of the two aforementioned DVD collections marking Davis’ birthday, Fox’s “Centenary Celebration Collection” is the best, with 1950’s quintessential “All About Eve,” 1952’s “Phone Call From a Stranger,” 1955’s “The Virgin Queen,” 1964’s “Hush…Hush, Sweet Charlotte” and 1965’s electrifying (literally) “The Nanny” included.

As for “Eve,” it’s my favorite Davis film, and my favorite movie, period. It embodies everything you love about the actress, every reason you come to her for that unique and necessary escape only a great movie and actor can provide. As many times as I’ve watched the movie, it still reveals something new with each viewing, which is the mark of a great film. The writing, the performances, the wit, the directing, the storyline and of course Davis as Margo Channing, the complicated Broadway star for whom love was difficult and career meant everything (sound familiar?), come together with such timing and ease, it’s staggering in how seamless it is. And that isn’t hyperbole.

Warner’s “Bette Davis Collection, Vol. 3” offers some of Davis’ earlier films. When compared to Fox’s collection, you could say this one features Davis’ softer side. Included are 1939’s “The Old Maid,” 1940’s “All This and Heaven Too,” 1941’s “The Great Lie,” 1942’s “In This Our Life,” 1943’s “Watch on the Rhine” and 1946’s very good “Deception.”

Taken as a whole, these collections offer invaluable insight into the savvy way Davis handled her career and especially her complex screen persona. Consider viewing both sets back-to-back over the course of a week, and then consider whether there ever has been an actress as great as Bette Davis.

Grades: “Centenary”: A; “Bette Davis Collection, Vol. 3”: B+

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Netvibes

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous said...

    That was fabulous. Thank you, Christopher! All About Eve is also my favorite film.

  2. Anonymous said...

    Very well written. I love Bette Davis but fear too many are too young to remember her. This will help, as will the collection. Nice job.

  3. Anonymous said...

    Christopher,
    You comments re the Cape Elizabeth property Betty named "Witchway", an obvious play on words, are in extremely poor taste and lack accuracy and architectural knowledge, and reflect you don't understand the real significance of the property in Betty's life.

    Witchway had no architectural significance (per Earl Shuttleworth, Maine Historical Preservation Society Director), was rotted to the core following decades of neglect and substandard foam winterization decades earlier, and had animals defecating and otherwise living in the walls and attic. The entire electrical system was from the 1920s and all of the fireplaces leaked badly and had rotted the balloon framing. All of the plumbing had asbestos rotting on it, lead paint contamination was throughout, and mold readings were off the chart from a habitation safety standpoint.

    As to the new buildings on the property, they were designed by noted shingle style architect Joseph Waltman. The main house and the carriage house are extremely tasteful and appear to have been in place from the early 1900s. Betty would be proud.

    As to the significance to Betty's life? Locals relate that Gary Merrill was caught fornicating with one of the maid staff in an outbuilding. With a tumultuous roar, it is said Betty called the police to have him removed from the property, along with all his personal belongings which she threw from the second story bedroom window while screaming about his betrayal.

  4. Anonymous said...

    Hi Anonymous--

    Betty is spelled Bette. Your lack of knowledge of that is enough for me to dismiss your diatribe. And please--obviously the house could have been rebuilt to form regardless of the damage done. As for Gary Merrill getting it on, who cares? It's the house, it's Davis--that's what matters.

    Christopher

  5. Anonymous said...

    Christopher,
    Your article was a sophomoric diatribe and in extremely poor taste regarding the new house, one admired by all who know the historical significance of the "Shingle Style", Joe Waltman's place in Maine architectural history and homage to it, and Earl Shuttleworth's sensibilities about such quality design.

    The facts you dismiss on the childish grounds that I missplled "Bette" are plain, verifiable facts, whether you like them or not is pointless. Again, when the nationally acclaimed and Maine's own Historical Society director speaks, those with intellect process his input. The integrity of the original structure had long since been irrevocably compromised and was without redeeming architectural or any other aesthetic value. If you wanted to preserve and "rehabilitate" such a rotting eyesore from being replaced, you should have acquired the property where you would have been entitled to do so, as long as you had a few million laying around to repair a $500k structure. Moreover, that you so quickly dimissed the heartache Gary Merrill brought to her at that location, makes it clear you have no knowledge that she considered Merrill the love of her life and one who brought her the most contentedness and joy, right up until he so flagrantly violated the sanctity of their marriage.

    All that speaks volumes of your superficiality, and you must have been the last one picked for you college and high school debate teams.